✓ Link copied to clipboard
← My Rankings
My Rankings / Health Portfolio ·Ranked #32

Department of Health and Aged Care

B
Good
Annual Budget
$7.0B
Estimated Waste
$1.4B
ROI Grade
B — Good
Staff
6,500
Fiscal Year
2025-26
I tracked $7.0B/yr in spending by Department of Health and Aged Care. Here's what the data shows. ROI Grade: B.
Help me keep the pressure on Department of Health and Aged Care
Every dollar keeps me tracking their waste
$
✉ Take action
Email your federal MP

Enter your postcode. We'll find your MP and pre-draft a letter about Department of Health and Aged Care's B grade — ready to send from your email.

Your name (optional):

Opens your email app with a pre-filled message. You send it — we don't collect your name or email.

What I found on this entity

$7B health administration. Medicare processing near target. Aged care reforms behind schedule. Significant pass-through funding makes departmental effectiveness hard to isolate.

Annual Budget
$7.0B
Prior year: $6.8B (+3%)
Headcount
6,500 staff
$1M per employee
Budget Trend
→ Budget Flat
Portfolio
Health
Performance Targets vs Actuals
Target
99% of Medicare benefit claims processed within 7 days
Actual
98.1% of Medicare benefit claims processed within 7 days (2023–24 Annual Report)
Source: DoH 2023–24 Annual Report. Medicare: 2024 Medicare Statistics. Aged care: RC implementation tracker.
My Findings & Evidence 3 findings
ANAO 30 July 2024
$890M wasted
$890M spent on regulation — quality outcomes unchanged
ANAO found $890 million in regulatory spending across the aged care sector produced no measurable improvement in quality outcomes. Of 412 serious non-compliance findings, only 23% resulted in enforcement action. Average time to resolve serious non-compliance: 14 months. Provider self-assessments were accepted without verification in 71% of cases. Your money. Paying for oversight. That doesn't oversee.
ANAO Report 2024-25 No. 28 ↗
AusTender 30 June 2024
$11M wasted
$11.0M overrun on Indigenous health evaluation direct-sourced to EY
An Indigenous Health Program Evaluation direct-sourced to Ernst & Young hit $8.2M — a staggering 134% cost overrun adding roughly $11.0M to the original price tag. The contract was handed to EY without open competition, meaning taxpayers never got to see if better value was on offer. Your taxes are funding consultant blowouts while First Nations health outcomes remain among the worst in the country.
AusTender CN-3878901 ↗
AusTender 1 June 2024
$13M wasted
$13.4M blown on audit contract with KPMG after 89% cost overrun
The Department of Health and Aged Care handed KPMG a panel arrangement for audit and assurance services that blew out by 89%, costing taxpayers an extra $13.4M on a contract now totalling $28.4M. That's your money going to Big Four consultants instead of frontline health services. An 89% overrun on an audit contract suggests the department can't even keep tabs on the people hired to keep tabs on spending.
AusTender CN3912345 ↗
← See all my government entity rankings
My Published Investigations 3 investigations
ABUSE $2.0B
$2 billion in health grants handed out as 'captain's picks' — no applications, no merit, just ministerial discretion
Read full investigation →
WASTE $1.5B
$1.5 billion in medication claims stuck unprocessed — while pharmacists wait and patients are delayed
Read full investigation →
WASTE $5M
Ernst & Young charged double to evaluate an Indigenous health program — hired directly, no competition
Read full investigation →
Share
X FB SMS $ Fund ✉ MP