The Community Health and Hospitals Program distributed $2 billion in health grants without a formal application process, breaching grant guidelines. Projects were chosen by ministers without departmental merit assessment. The Centre for Public Integrity called it "brazen disregard for existing laws" — worse than Sports Rorts.
Enter your postcode. We'll find your MP and pre-draft a letter about Department of Health and Aged Care's $2.0B in waste — ready to send from your email.
Opens your email app with a pre-filled message. You send it — we don't collect your name or email.
$2.0B of Australian taxpayer money was misused at Department of Health and Aged Care. The Community Health and Hospitals Program distributed $2 billion in health grants without a formal application process, breaching grant guidelines. Projects were chosen by ministers without departmental merit assessment. The Centre for Public Integrity called it "brazen disregard for existing laws" — worse than Sports Rorts.
Spread across Australia's 10.8 million households, that's roughly $185 per family — enough in total for funding roughly 17 public hospitals for a full year.
The Community Health and Hospitals Program (CHHP) distributed $2 billion in health grants without a formal application process, breaching Commonwealth grant guidelines. Projects were chosen by Coalition ministers without departmental merit assessment.
ANAO Performance Audit 2024-25 confirmed the breaches. Health Minister Mark Butler (ALP) described the audit findings as revealing "waste, rorts and captain's picks" — an acknowledgment that the program was fundamentally misadministered.
The Centre for Public Integrity assessed the CHHP case as worse than the 2020 Sports Rorts scandal because:
- The sums are larger ($2B vs $100M in Sports Rorts)
- The legal breaches were more deliberate and systematic
- The absence of any application process left no paper trail of merit assessment
CHHP grants were allocated by ministers based on electoral and political considerations, not health need or evidence. No independent assessment of which projects actually improved health outcomes has been published.
Per household: $2B across 10.8M households = $185 per household in discretionary health grants without merit criteria.
Sources:
- Centre for Public Integrity: https://publicintegrity.org.au/coalition-governments-brazen-health-grant-breach-worse-than-sports-rorts-integrity-body-says/
- AFR reporting: https://www.afr.com/topic/australian-national-audit-office-6fnw
Every share puts pressure on the people responsible. Make it impossible to ignore.
I send every new finding. Daily. No fluff.