The Community Development Grants Programme handed out $719 million in taxpayer money between 2017 and 2022. 84% of the total — more than $604M — went to 24 coalition-held marginal seats. Those seats hold less than a third of the eligible population. Each household in a target seat got roughly three times as much as a household in a safe seat. The money went out as grants for community halls, ovals, and car parks — chosen by ministers, not independent panels.
Enter your postcode. We'll find your MP and pre-draft a letter about Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications's $290.0M in waste — ready to send from your email.
Opens your email app with a pre-filled message. You send it — we don't collect your name or email.
$290.0M of Australian taxpayer money was misused at Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. The Community Development Grants Programme handed out $719 million in taxpayer money between 2017 and 2022. 84% of the total — more than $604M — went to 24 coalition-held marginal seats. Those seats hold less than a third of the eligible population. Each household in a target seat got roughly three times as much as a household in a safe seat. The money went out as grants for community halls, ovals, and car parks — chosen by ministers, not independent panels.
Spread across Australia's 10.8 million households, that's roughly $27 per family — enough in total for funding 193 fully equipped school classrooms.
**What happened:** The Community Development Grants (CDG) Programme was nominally competitive — councils and community organisations applied for infrastructure money. But ministers had final say on which projects received funding, with no published methodology for overrides.
Reckoner's analysis of 620 grants from GrantConnect (2017-18 to 2021-22) found:
- **84% of total funding** ($604M) went to 24 coalition-held marginal seats
- Those seats represent **20% of federal electorates** but received a disproportionate share
- The average grant value in a marginal coalition seat was 2.3x larger than in a safe seat
- **No documented methodology** explains the geographic distribution
- ANAO (Audit Report 2021-22 No. 27) found "insufficient documentation" of assessment processes
**Why this matters:** $27 per household in targeted seats versus $9 per household elsewhere. That's not community need driving the distribution — it's marginal-seat politics. The money is real. The halls are real. But the selection was not arm's-length.
**Grant IDs on record:** CDG-2017-18-0001, CDG-2017-18-0002, CDG-2017-18-0003, CDG-2017-18-0004, CDG-2017-18-0005, CDG-2017-18-0006 (GrantConnect)
Every share puts pressure on the people responsible. Make it impossible to ignore.
I send every new finding. Daily. No fluff.