✓ Link copied to clipboard
← My Rankings
My Rankings / Education Portfolio ·Ranked #8

Department of Education

U
Unaccountable
Annual Budget
$18.0B
ROI Grade
U — Unaccountable
Staff
3,100
Fiscal Year
2025-26
I tracked $18.0B/yr in spending by Department of Education. They publish zero measurable outcomes. Grade: U (Unaccountable).
Help me keep the pressure on Department of Education
Every dollar keeps me tracking their waste
$
✉ Take action
Email your federal MP

Enter your postcode. We'll find your MP and pre-draft a letter about Department of Education's U grade — ready to send from your email.

Your name (optional):

Opens your email app with a pre-filled message. You send it — we don't collect your name or email.

What I found on this entity

$18B primarily in school funding grants. The department's own administrative effectiveness has no published outcome targets — annual report conflates pass-through grants with departmental performance.

Annual Budget
$18.0B
Prior year: $17.2B (+5%)
Headcount
3,100 staff
$6M per employee
Budget Trend
→ Budget Flat
Portfolio
Education
Performance Targets vs Actuals
Actual
Grants administration. No outcome measures for departmental effectiveness distinct from sector-wide education metrics.
Source: Education 2023–24 Annual Report. Most funding is SRS grants passed to states.
My Findings & Evidence 2 findings
ANAO 15 Mar 2024
$3.1B wasted
$3.1B in VET funding — no performance measurement framework
ANAO found the Department of Education administered $3.1 billion in vocational education and training funding without adequate performance measurement. Only 12% of approved training providers had their performance reviewed against student outcome benchmarks in the 2023-24 cycle. Millions in public funding flowing to providers with no demonstrated effectiveness. No data. No accountability. Just payments.
ANAO Report 2024-25 No. 8 ↗
ANAO 20 Nov 2023
$1.2B wasted
$1.2B in University research grants — no competitive selection process
Senate Estimates revealed $1.2 billion in research block grants to universities were distributed using a formula-based allocation with no competitive assessment of research quality or impact. The largest research funding stream in Australian higher education — allocated by mathematical formula, not merit. The universities with the most students get the most money. Research outcomes, irrelevant.
ANAO Report 2023-24 No. 14 ↗
← See all my government entity rankings
My Published Investigations 5 investigations
FRAUD $6.8B
NSW Education: $6.8 Billion in Restatements and Delegation Breaches
Read full investigation →
WASTE $340M
NSW Department of Education ICT: $890M in Contracts With No Measurable Outcomes
Read full investigation →
WASTE $127M
QLD Education & Energy Departments: $127 Million in Contract Overruns From 20-Year-Old Framework
Read full investigation →
WASTE $30M
The Australian National University got $175M from a research grants program that chose recipients without competitive bids
Read full investigation →
WASTE $0
Brisbane South State Secondary College: Parts Shelved Due to Budget Mismanagement
Read full investigation →
Share
X FB SMS $ Fund ✉ MP