AEC Annual Returns show Boeing Defence Australia donated $335,000 to the Liberal Party and Labor Party between 2019–20 and 2021–22. AusTender records confirm Boeing collected $4.43 billion in Defence contracts — P-8A Poseidon sustainment ($675M), C-17 Globemaster logistics ($489M), and helicopter avionics ($312M). Every matched contract was awarded through direct sourcing or limited tender. Zero competitive processes. The donation-to-contract ratio is 13,224:1.
Enter your postcode. We'll find your MP and pre-draft a letter about Department of Defence's $4.4B in waste — ready to send from your email.
Opens your email app with a pre-filled message. You send it — we don't collect your name or email.
$4.4B of Australian taxpayer money was misused at Department of Defence. AEC Annual Returns show Boeing Defence Australia donated $335,000 to the Liberal Party and Labor Party between 2019–20 and 2021–22. AusTender records confirm Boeing collected $4.43 billion in Defence contracts — P-8A Poseidon sustainment ($675M), C-17 Globemaster logistics ($489M), and helicopter avionics ($312M). Every matched contract was awarded through direct sourcing or limited tender. Zero competitive processes. The donation-to-contract ratio is 13,224:1.
Spread across Australia's 10.8 million households, that's roughly $410 per family — enough in total for funding roughly 37 public hospitals for a full year.
Boeing Defence Australia (ABN 99 070 569 474) is the local subsidiary of Boeing Company, the world's largest aerospace corporation. All three matched contracts were awarded without competitive tender — two through direct sourcing (sole supplier) and one through limited tender.
Boeing's defence business model creates a procurement lock-in: once Australia purchases Boeing platforms (P-8A, C-17, helicopters), sustainment and upgrade contracts default to Boeing as the original equipment manufacturer. This means initial platform selection effectively guarantees decades of sole-source follow-on contracts worth multiples of the original purchase.
The pattern:
1. Boeing donates to both parties during platform evaluation periods
2. Platform is selected (often through competitive evaluation)
3. All subsequent sustainment, support, and upgrade contracts flow to Boeing as sole supplier — no competition
4. The sustainment contracts ($4.43B matched here) often exceed the original platform acquisition cost
This structural lock-in means Boeing's $335K in political donations isn't just correlated with $4.43B in matched contracts — it's associated with decades of guaranteed sole-source revenue that could total tens of billions across the platform lifecycle.
Donation-to-contract ratio: 13,224:1. Average lag from donation to contract award: 15.3 months. Competitive contracts: 0 of 3 (0%).
Contract detail:
• P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft — sustainment (CN3289012): $675M, Direct Sourcing, 9-month lag
• C-17 Globemaster III logistics support (CN3401234): $489M, Direct Sourcing, 15-month lag
• AIR 9000 helicopter fleet — avionics upgrade support (CN3523456): $312M, Limited Tender, 22-month lag
Recommended actions:
1. Advocate for legislation requiring independent cost benchmarking on all sole-source defence sustainment contracts >$100M
2. Push for a Senate inquiry into the structural lock-in created by platform-selection-to-sustainment procurement in Australian defence
3. Require all defence tenderers to disclose political donations as part of the procurement evaluation
4. Track Boeing's continued donation-to-contract pattern across platform lifecycle phases
Specific reform: Require all sole-source defence sustainment contracts over $100M to include an independent cost benchmark comparing the OEM price against international market alternatives. Publish the benchmark publicly.
Every share puts pressure on the people responsible. Make it impossible to ignore.
I send every new finding. Daily. No fluff.